Ease of use and personal preference are obviously up to you to test and decideįuji raw converter (either in camera or using the PC software)Įverything else at this point I considered unusable. X transformer and enhance detailed fix all of that for me. For negatives with orange mask, this could be part of the outer, not exposed, regions of the image. It looks like this: With the picker, you can select a region where the base material of the film should be gray. In the worst case scenario, you can always switch back to RawTherapee As regards darktable, judging by its github daily commits, there are many people working on it 1. By default you get a lot of jittering and jagged edges that look terrible at 100%, along with all the other x trans related issues. Darktable has a special module for this purpose: The Invert module.
One thing xtransformer and adobe enhance details handles better than others is the aliasing of angled and especially thin lines. I came to these results based on pure quality of images, how well it handles aliasing, sharpening, general detail, color, etc. Selecting the right modules takes some time, and often, you can’t see the. Here is the order of quality from my extensive testing from when I switched to Fuji a couple months ago. Although Darktable offers you all those options and possibilities within a modern user interface, it’s quite untidy. When comparing RawTherapee and darktable you can also consider the following projects: davinci-resolve-linux - Setup Davinci Resolve on Linux an Fix Issues with Importing and Exporting Media czkawka - Multi functional app to find duplicates, empty folders, similar images etc. You could use that and then keep using Lightroom as you always have. It's relatively cheap compared to other software's and handles batch processing pretty well. For what's it's worth, x transformer by far creates the best files from the Fuji raws out of everything I tested.
0 kommentar(er)
